Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 22 Feb 2022 11:48:38 +0100 | From | Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Revert "xen-netback: Check for hotplug-status existence before watching" |
| |
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 09:31:31AM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 01:18:17AM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > This reverts commit 2afeec08ab5c86ae21952151f726bfe184f6b23d. > > > > The reasoning in the commit was wrong - the code expected to setup the > > watch even if 'hotplug-status' didn't exist. In fact, it relied on the > > watch being fired the first time - to check if maybe 'hotplug-status' is > > already set to 'connected'. Not registering a watch for non-existing > > path (which is the case if hotplug script hasn't been executed yet), > > made the backend not waiting for the hotplug script to execute. This in > > turns, made the netfront think the interface is fully operational, while > > in fact it was not (the vif interface on xen-netback side might not be > > configured yet). > > > > This was a workaround for 'hotplug-status' erroneously being removed. > > But since that is reverted now, the workaround is not necessary either. > > > > More discussion at > > https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/afedd7cb-a291-e773-8b0d-4db9b291fa98@ipxe.org/T/#u > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com> > > --- > > I believe this is the same issue as discussed at > > https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/20220113111946.GA4133739@dingwall.me.uk/ > > Right - I believe we need to leave that workaround in place in libxl > in order to deal with bogus Linux netbacks?
I'm afraid so, yes.
-- Best Regards, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki Invisible Things Lab [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |