lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] drm/msm/gpu: Fix crash on devices without devfreq support
From
On 19/02/2022 21:33, Rob Clark wrote:
> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
>
> Avoid going down devfreq paths on devices where devfreq is not
> initialized.
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> Reported-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c
> index 9bf319be11f6..26a3669a97b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c
> @@ -83,12 +83,17 @@ static struct devfreq_dev_profile msm_devfreq_profile = {
> static void msm_devfreq_boost_work(struct kthread_work *work);
> static void msm_devfreq_idle_work(struct kthread_work *work);
>
> +static bool has_devfreq(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> +{
> + return !!gpu->funcs->gpu_busy;

I see that devfreq init will be skipped if gpu_busy is NULL.
Can we use gpu->devfreq instead of this condition?

I noticed that you have replaced some of gpu->devfreq checks with
has_devreq() calls. Is there any difference?

> +}
> +
> void msm_devfreq_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> {
> struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = &gpu->devfreq;
>
> /* We need target support to do devfreq */
> - if (!gpu->funcs->gpu_busy)
> + if (!has_devfreq(gpu))
> return;
>
> dev_pm_qos_add_request(&gpu->pdev->dev, &df->idle_freq,
> @@ -149,6 +154,9 @@ void msm_devfreq_cleanup(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> {
> struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = &gpu->devfreq;
>
> + if (!has_devfreq(gpu))
> + return;
> +
> devfreq_cooling_unregister(gpu->cooling);
> dev_pm_qos_remove_request(&df->boost_freq);
> dev_pm_qos_remove_request(&df->idle_freq);
> @@ -156,16 +164,24 @@ void msm_devfreq_cleanup(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>
> void msm_devfreq_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> {
> - gpu->devfreq.busy_cycles = 0;
> - gpu->devfreq.time = ktime_get();
> + struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = &gpu->devfreq;
>
> - devfreq_resume_device(gpu->devfreq.devfreq);
> + if (!has_devfreq(gpu))
> + return;
> +
> + df->busy_cycles = 0;
> + df->time = ktime_get();
> +
> + devfreq_resume_device(df->devfreq);
> }
>
> void msm_devfreq_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> {
> struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = &gpu->devfreq;
>
> + if (!has_devfreq(gpu))
> + return;
> +
> devfreq_suspend_device(df->devfreq);
>
> cancel_idle_work(df);
> @@ -185,6 +201,9 @@ void msm_devfreq_boost(struct msm_gpu *gpu, unsigned factor)
> struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = &gpu->devfreq;
> uint64_t freq;
>
> + if (!has_devfreq(gpu))
> + return;
> +
> freq = get_freq(gpu);
> freq *= factor;
>
> @@ -207,7 +226,7 @@ void msm_devfreq_active(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> struct devfreq_dev_status status;
> unsigned int idle_time;
>
> - if (!df->devfreq)
> + if (!has_devfreq(gpu))
> return;
>
> /*
> @@ -253,7 +272,7 @@ void msm_devfreq_idle(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> {
> struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = &gpu->devfreq;
>
> - if (!df->devfreq)
> + if (!has_devfreq(gpu))
> return;
>
> msm_hrtimer_queue_work(&df->idle_work, ms_to_ktime(1),


--
With best wishes
Dmitry

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-02-23 04:11    [W:0.103 / U:1.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site