lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/bridge: use atomic enable/disable for bridge callbacks
Quoting Vinod Polimera (2022-02-21 06:51:24)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/panel.c
> index b32295a..5c7dc82 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/panel.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/panel.c
> @@ -102,30 +136,82 @@ static void panel_bridge_detach(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> drm_connector_cleanup(connector);
> }
>
> -static void panel_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +static void panel_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> + struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
> {
> struct panel_bridge *panel_bridge = drm_bridge_to_panel_bridge(bridge);
> + struct drm_atomic_state *old_state = old_bridge_state->base.state;
> + struct drm_encoder *encoder = bridge->encoder;
> + struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> + struct drm_crtc_state *old_crtc_state;
> +
> + crtc = bridge_drm_get_new_connector_crtc(encoder, old_state);
> + if (!crtc)
> + return;
> +
> + old_crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_old_crtc_state(old_state, crtc);
> + if (old_crtc_state && old_crtc_state->self_refresh_active)

Can you please add some comment about why self_refresh_active means we
should bail out from this function? Such a comment would be helpful to
understand the code quickly vs. having to figure out what the intention
of the logic is. The analogix driver has

/* Don't touch the panel if we're coming back from PSR */

so even mentioning PSR here would be helpful.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-02-22 22:21    [W:0.144 / U:0.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site