lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v1] io_uring: Add support for napi_busy_poll
    From
    Date
    On Sat, 2022-02-19 at 17:22 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
    >
    > Outside of this, I was hoping to see some performance numbers in the
    > main patch. Sounds like you have them, can you share?
    >
    Yes.

    It is not much. Only numbers from my application and it is far from
    being the best benchmark because the result can be influenced by
    multiple external factors.

    Beside addressing the race condition remaining inside io_cqring_wait()
    around napi_list for v2 patch, creating a benchmark program that
    isolate the performance of the new feature is on my todo list.

    I would think that creating a simple UDP ping-pong setup and measure
    RTT with and without busy_polling should be a good enough test.

    In the meantime, here are the results that I have:

    Without io_uring busy poll:
    reaction time to an update: 17159usec
    reaction time to an update: 19068usec
    reaction time to an update: 23055usec
    reaction time to an update: 16511usec
    reaction time to an update: 17604usec

    With io_uring busy poll:
    reaction time to an update: 15782usec
    reaction time to an update: 15337usec
    reaction time to an update: 15379usec
    reaction time to an update: 15275usec
    reaction time to an update: 15107usec

    Concerning my latency issue with busy polling, I have found this that
    might help me:
    https://lwn.net/ml/netdev/20201002222514.1159492-1-weiwan@google.com/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2022-02-20 19:39    [W:4.930 / U:0.108 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site