lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Feb]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] remoteproc: mtk_scp: Use dev_err_probe() where possible
From
Il 01/02/22 19:36, Mathieu Poirier ha scritto:
> Hi Angelo,
>
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 01:09:15PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> Simplify the probe function, where possible, by using dev_err_probe().
>> While at it, as to increase human readability, also remove some
>> unnecessary forced void pointer casts that were previously used in
>> error checking.
>
> I am in favour of all 3 patches (please add a cover letter next time) but weary
> about testing - do you have access to a Mediatek platform to try this on or
> is it purely theoretical?
>
> I would definitely feel better to see a "Tested-by" tag by someone out there
> with access to the HW.
>
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
>

Hello Mathieu,

I have multiple MediaTek platforms and I always test on all of them before
pushing such commits upstream, so, even though this kind of patch is trivial,
this is *not* purely theoretical and I confirm that this was successfully tested.

Regards,
Angelo

>>
>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 28 ++++++++++++----------------
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
>> index e40706b0e015..dcddb33e9997 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
>> @@ -757,10 +757,8 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> int ret, i;
>>
>> rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &scp_ops, fw_name, sizeof(*scp));
>> - if (!rproc) {
>> - dev_err(dev, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
>> - return -ENOMEM;
>> - }
>> + if (!rproc)
>> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENOMEM, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
>>
>> scp = (struct mtk_scp *)rproc->priv;
>> scp->rproc = rproc;
>> @@ -770,21 +768,20 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "sram");
>> scp->sram_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
>> - if (IS_ERR((__force void *)scp->sram_base)) {
>> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to parse and map sram memory\n");
>> - return PTR_ERR((__force void *)scp->sram_base);
>> - }
>> + if (IS_ERR(scp->sram_base))
>> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp->sram_base),
>> + "Failed to parse and map sram memory\n");
>> +
>> scp->sram_size = resource_size(res);
>> scp->sram_phys = res->start;
>>
>> /* l1tcm is an optional memory region */
>> res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "l1tcm");
>> scp->l1tcm_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
>> - if (IS_ERR((__force void *)scp->l1tcm_base)) {
>> - ret = PTR_ERR((__force void *)scp->l1tcm_base);
>> + if (IS_ERR(scp->l1tcm_base)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(scp->l1tcm_base);
>> if (ret != -EINVAL) {
>> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to map l1tcm memory\n");
>> - return ret;
>> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to map l1tcm memory\n");
>> }
>> } else {
>> scp->l1tcm_size = resource_size(res);
>> @@ -792,10 +789,9 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> }
>>
>> scp->reg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "cfg");
>> - if (IS_ERR((__force void *)scp->reg_base)) {
>> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to parse and map cfg memory\n");
>> - return PTR_ERR((__force void *)scp->reg_base);
>> - }
>> + if (IS_ERR(scp->reg_base))
>> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp->reg_base),
>> + "Failed to parse and map cfg memory\n");
>>
>> ret = scp->data->scp_clk_get(scp);
>> if (ret)
>> --
>> 2.33.1
>>


--
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Software Engineer

Collabora Ltd.
Platinum Building, St John's Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS, UK
Registered in England & Wales, no. 5513718

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-02-02 10:04    [W:0.108 / U:0.388 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site