Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 18 Feb 2022 19:46:07 +0300 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/dpu: Bind pingpong block to intf on active ctls in cmd encoder | From | Dmitry Baryshkov <> |
| |
On 02/02/2022 12:48, Marijn Suijten wrote: > On 2022-01-20 02:12:51, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >> On 22/12/2021 13:55, Marijn Suijten wrote: >>> As per the specification of DPU_CTL_ACTIVE_CFG the configuration of >>> active blocks should be proactively specified, and the pingpong block is >>> no different. >>> >>> The downstream display driver [1] confirms this by also calling >>> bind_pingpong_blk on CTL_ACTIVE_CFG. Note that this else-if is always >>> entered, as setup_intf_cfg - unlike this mainline dpu driver that >>> combines both behind the same function pointer - is left NULL in favour >>> of using setup_intf_cfg_v1 when CTL_ACTIVE_CFG is set. >>> >>> This solves continuous timeouts on at least the Qualcomm sm6125 SoC: >>> >>> [drm:dpu_encoder_frame_done_timeout:2091] [dpu error]enc31 frame done timeout >>> [drm:_dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_handle_ppdone_timeout.isra.0] *ERROR* id:31 pp:0 kickoff timeout 0 cnt 1 koff_cnt 1 >>> [drm:dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_prepare_for_kickoff] *ERROR* failed wait_for_idle: id:31 ret:-110 pp:0 >>> >>> In the same way this pingpong block should also be unbound followed by >>> an interface flush when the encoder is disabled, according to the >>> downstream display driver [2]. >>> >>> [1]: https://source.codeaurora.org/quic/la/platform/vendor/opensource/display-drivers/tree/msm/sde/sde_encoder_phys_cmd.c?h=LA.UM.9.16.r1-08500-MANNAR.0#n167 >>> [2]: https://source.codeaurora.org/quic/la/platform/vendor/opensource/display-drivers/tree/msm/sde/sde_encoder.c?h=LA.UM.9.16.r1-08500-MANNAR.0#n2986 >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org> >>> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org> >> >> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> >> >>> --- >>> .../drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c >>> index 8e433af7aea4..e0e08a874f07 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c >>> @@ -71,6 +71,13 @@ static void _dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_update_intf_cfg( >>> intf_cfg.stream_sel = cmd_enc->stream_sel; >>> intf_cfg.mode_3d = dpu_encoder_helper_get_3d_blend_mode(phys_enc); >>> ctl->ops.setup_intf_cfg(ctl, &intf_cfg); >>> + >>> + /* setup which pp blk will connect to this intf */ >>> + if (test_bit(DPU_CTL_ACTIVE_CFG, &ctl->caps->features) && phys_enc->hw_intf->ops.bind_pingpong_blk) >> >> Nit: here we bind all interfaces, but later we unbind only master. Is >> this correct? > > Not sure: it seems downstream only calls > _sde/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_update_intf_cfg when it is _not_ a ppsplit > slave, which appears to be very similar to being the master (both check > for ENC_ROLE_SLAVE but ppsplit also checks RM topology support for > ppsplit). Should we do this too before calling > _dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_update_intf_cfg?
The PP split is a special topology using a single LM, but two PP (and two INTFs). The dpu driver doesn't provide support for it, so ppsplit is always false.
> > - Marijn > >>> + phys_enc->hw_intf->ops.bind_pingpong_blk( >>> + phys_enc->hw_intf, >>> + true, >>> + phys_enc->hw_pp->idx); >>> } >>> >>> static void dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_pp_tx_done_irq(void *arg, int irq_idx) >>> @@ -507,6 +514,7 @@ static void dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_disable(struct dpu_encoder_phys *phys_enc) >>> { >>> struct dpu_encoder_phys_cmd *cmd_enc = >>> to_dpu_encoder_phys_cmd(phys_enc); >>> + struct dpu_hw_ctl *ctl; >>> >>> if (!phys_enc->hw_pp) { >>> DPU_ERROR("invalid encoder\n"); >>> @@ -523,6 +531,19 @@ static void dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_disable(struct dpu_encoder_phys *phys_enc) >>> >>> if (phys_enc->hw_pp->ops.enable_tearcheck) >>> phys_enc->hw_pp->ops.enable_tearcheck(phys_enc->hw_pp, false); >>> + >>> + if (dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_is_master(phys_enc)) {
Please remove this condition. Just check for existence of bind_pingpong_blk.
>>> + if (phys_enc->hw_intf->ops.bind_pingpong_blk) { >>> + phys_enc->hw_intf->ops.bind_pingpong_blk( >>> + phys_enc->hw_intf, >>> + false, >>> + phys_enc->hw_pp->idx); >>> + >>> + ctl = phys_enc->hw_ctl; >>> + ctl->ops.update_pending_flush_intf(ctl, phys_enc->intf_idx); >>> + } >>> + } >>> + >>> phys_enc->enable_state = DPU_ENC_DISABLED; >>> } >>> >> >> >> -- >> With best wishes >> Dmitry
-- With best wishes Dmitry
| |