lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Feb]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 0/3] block, bfq: minor cleanup and fix
From
Date
friendly ping ...

在 2022/02/10 19:46, yukuai (C) 写道:
> 在 2022/01/29 10:05, yukuai (C) 写道:
>> 在 2022/01/29 9:51, Jens Axboe 写道:
>>> On 1/28/22 6:59 PM, Yu Kuai wrote:
>>>> Changes in v3:
>>>>   - fix a clerical error in patch 2
>>>>
>>>> Chagnes in v2:
>>>>   - add comment in patch 2
>>>>   - remove patch 4, since the problem do not exist.
>>>>
>>>> Yu Kuai (3):
>>>>    block, bfq: cleanup bfq_bfqq_to_bfqg()
>>>>    block, bfq: avoid moving bfqq to it's parent bfqg
>>>>    block, bfq: don't move oom_bfqq
>>>>
>>>>   block/bfq-cgroup.c  | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>>>>   block/bfq-iosched.c |  4 ++--
>>>>   block/bfq-iosched.h |  1 -
>>>>   block/bfq-wf2q.c    | 15 ---------------
>>>>   4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> I'm not even looking at this until you tell me that:
>>>
>>> a) you've actually compiled this one. which, btw, I can't believe
>>>     needs mentioning, particularly when you had enough time to keep
>>>     pinging about this patchset.
>>>
>>> b) it's actually be run. last one was clearly not.
>>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I compiled and tested the patchset locally in a different version,
>> v4.19 specifically. However, after I decide to send them to mainline,
>> I made such clerical mistake and forgot to check the patches.
>>
>> My sincerely apologize again...
>> Kuai
>
> Hi, Jens
>
> Can you please apply this patch this time?
>
> Thanks,
> Kuai

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-02-18 09:31    [W:0.074 / U:0.212 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site