Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 14 Feb 2022 15:12:51 +0900 | From | Sergey Senozhatsky <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH printk v1 10/13] printk: add kthread console printers |
| |
On (22/02/08 15:53), Petr Mladek wrote: > My mine concern is that the kthread_worker API still uses an internal > lock. And it is yet another layer that might be hard to debug when > printk() does not work.
Isn't this also true for kthreads? Looks like we add "couple of spin_locks" to the picture - rq, etc. - one way of the other.
| |