Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:59:55 +0000 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] regulator: dt-bindings: maxim,max14577: convert to dtschema |
| |
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 05:54:01PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 14/02/2022 17:43, Mark Brown wrote:
> >> + required: > >> + - regulator-name
> > Why is regulator-name required? While it's a good idea for users to > > document names for supplies on their boards it shouldn't be a > > requirement or something that a driver would care about.
> Indeed, there is no need for requiring the name. I guess I copied it > from other schemas.
Those other schemas should be fixed as well, if this is required for anything then there's a problem - this is purely diagnostic information for users. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |