lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Re: [PATCH 2/2] soc: s4: Add support for power domains controller
Date
Hi Shunzhou,

"shunzhou.jiang@amlogic.com" <shunzhou.jiang@amlogic.com> writes:

> Hi Kevin:
> Thanks your kindly reply

You're welcome. For future reference, please avoid top-posting. See:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/2.Process.html?highlight=top-posting#mailing-lists

> For those domains, default is active, we hope not close when in use or not in use, in our case,
> only runtime PM (include suspend) control this, so set always on flag to avoid domain shutdown,

my question remains: why do want to keep these powered on even when they
are not in use?

The goal of the power-domain framework + runtime PM is to be able to
save power by turnin off power domains when they are not in use.

> if you also have concern, we can control this not in kernel, but this not our expect.

My strong preference is that this is controlled by the kernel.

Kevin

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-02-11 19:53    [W:0.046 / U:1.696 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site