lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Feb]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH v1] nvme/pci: Add quick suspend quirk for Toshiba drive.
Date
Thanks keith for review.
Yes moved the condition check outside vendor/device check in Patchset 2.

-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2022 8:31 PM
To: Nitin Rawat (QUIC) <quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>; Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>; linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Sajida Bhanu (Temp) (QUIC) <quic_c_sbhanu@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] nvme/pci: Add quick suspend quirk for Toshiba drive.

On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 05:51:16PM +0530, Nitin Rawat wrote:
> The Toshiba KBG40ZPZ256G SSD is having resume issues on SC7280 platform.
> Hence enabling quick suspend quirks for Toshiba KBG40ZPZ256G on sc7280
> platform so that nvme device is taken through shutdown path during
> resume.
>
> No issue is seen after enabling this quirks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shaik Sajida Bhanu <quic_c_sbhanu@quicinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/pci.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c index
> 6a99ed6..04c5954 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> @@ -3032,6 +3032,15 @@ static unsigned long check_vendor_combination_bug(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> if ((dmi_match(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "LENOVO")) &&
> dmi_match(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "LNVNB161216"))
> return NVME_QUIRK_SIMPLE_SUSPEND;
> +
> + /*
> + * Toshiba KBG40ZPZ256G on Sc7280 platform is having NVMe
> + * Resume issue. Appending quick suspend quirks for sc7280
> + * platforms so that full NVMe device shutdown path is
> + * executed during resume.
> + */
> + if (of_machine_is_compatible("qcom,sc7280"))
> + return NVME_QUIRK_SIMPLE_SUSPEND;

Shouldn't this check be moved outside the vendor/device check? It doesn't seem like this behavior for this platform is specific to any particular controller, right?

Otherwise, looks fine.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-02-10 17:59    [W:0.046 / U:0.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site