lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] mux: remove the Kconfig question for the subsystem
On Wed, Dec 7, 2022, at 18:19, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 12/7/22 00:41, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> For the other subsystems I mentioned, there are occasionally
>> problems with missing 'select' that tend to be a pain to find,
>> compared to subsystems consistently using 'depends on', which
>> show up as link failures in randconfig builds.
>
> I find that various drivers mixing the use of "select" and
> "depends on" is problematic.

Agreed. Even just mixing 'select' with user-visible symbols
is very confusing. The two sensible ways are either using
user-visible options with 'depends on' or hidden options with
'select'.

> However, there was no answer for the original question:
> How does a user enable the 4 Kconfig symbols in drivers/mux/Kconfig
> if some other random driver has not selected MULTIPLEXER?

There is no need to enable any of them in this case, because
the mux drivers are not usable by themselves.

> I.e.:
>
> config MUX_ADG792A
> tristate "Analog Devices ADG792A/ADG792G Multiplexers"
>
> config MUX_ADGS1408
> tristate "Analog Devices ADGS1408/ADGS1409 Multiplexers"
>
> config MUX_GPIO
> tristate "GPIO-controlled Multiplexer"
>
> config MUX_MMIO
> tristate "MMIO/Regmap register bitfield-controlled Multiplexer"
>
> OK, MUX_MMIO is selected from some other drivers, but if that is not done,
> how can the first 3 be enabled by a user?

They cannot, that is the entire point of hiding the subsystem
when it is not used.

Arnd

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-12-07 19:59    [W:0.053 / U:0.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site