lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 2/2] HID: logitech-hidpp: Add Bluetooth Mouse M336/M337/M535 to unhandled_hidpp_devices[]
On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 10:47 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 10:29 AM Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2022-12-07 at 10:12 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > >
> > > Evidently, Logitech Bluetooth Mouse M336/M337/M535 (0xb016) does not
> > > work when HID++ is enabled for it,
> >
> > This needs the output of the hidpp-list-features tool mentioned earlier
> > in the thread so we can avoid words like "evidently" and provide
> > concrete proof.
>
> Well, so point me to a binary of this, please.
>
> > But why is it needed in this case?
>
> Because it doesn't work otherwise.
>
> > We purposefully try to avoid blanket
> > blocklists. The lack of HID++ can be probed, so the device should work
> > just as it used to (if the fallback code works).
>
> No, because the hid-generic driver has no way to check that the probe
> function of your driver fails for this particular device. The probing
> of hid-generic will fail so long as the device matches the device ID
> list of any specific HID driver. With patch [1/2] from this series
> applied this is unless that specific driver has a ->match() callback
> rejecting the given device.
>
> You'd need a list of drivers that have been tried and failed somewhere
> for that and AFAICS no such list is present in the code.

That is the reason why I never wanted to enable HID++ on all Logitech
mice, and this comes back to bite us at the worst time possible, right
before the merge window opens :(

>
> So a minimum fix for 6.1 that actually works for me is to add the
> non-working device to the blocklist. More sophisticated stuff can be
> done later.

Agree, but OTOH, Rafael, your mouse is not brand new AFAICT, so I am
worried that you won't be the only one complaining we just killed
their mouse.
So I think the even wiser solution would be to delay (and so revert in
6.1 or 6.2) the 2 patches that enable hid++ on all logitech mice
(8544c812e43ab7bdf40458411b83987b8cba924d and
532223c8ac57605a10e46dc0ab23dcf01c9acb43).

Cheers,
Benjamin

>
> > We should only list devices that need special handling, and the ones
> > that don't work once HID++ was probed unsuccessfully.
> >
> > > so add it to the list of devices
> > > that are not handled by logitech-hidpp.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 532223c8ac57 ("HID: logitech-hidpp: Enable HID++ for all the
> > > Logitech Bluetooth devices")
> > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > Index: linux-pm/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> > > +++ linux-pm/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> > > @@ -4274,6 +4274,7 @@ static const struct hid_device_id unhand
> > > { HID_BLUETOOTH_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_LOGITECH,
> > > USB_DEVICE_ID_LOGITECH_HARMONY_PS3) },
> > > /* Handled in hid-generic */
> > > { HID_BLUETOOTH_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_LOGITECH,
> > > USB_DEVICE_ID_LOGITECH_DINOVO_EDGE_KBD) },
> > > + { HID_BLUETOOTH_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_LOGITECH, 0xb016) },
> > > {}
> > > };
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-12-07 11:07    [W:0.873 / U:0.520 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site