lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [Regression] Logitech BT mouse unusable after commit 532223c8ac57 (still in 6.1-rc8)
From
Date
On Wed, 2022-12-07 at 09:58 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 3:58 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > Bastien, Jiri,
> >
> > Commit 532223c8ac57 ("HID: logitech-hidpp: Enable HID++ for all the
> > Logitech
> > Bluetooth devices") caused my Logitech Bluetooth mouse to become
> > unusable.
> >
> > Appended is the change I need to make it work again (note that
> > adding the
> > device ID to unhandled_hidpp_devices[] doesn't help, so there must
> > be some
> > significant enough difference in how the two cases are handled in
> > the stack).
> >
> > Here's what I get in the log without the patch below:
> >
> > [   36.710574] Bluetooth: HIDP (Human Interface Emulation) ver 1.2
> > [   36.710592] Bluetooth: HIDP socket layer initialized
> > [   36.724644] hid-generic 0005:046D:B016.0001: unknown main item
> > tag 0x0
> > [   36.725860] input: Bluetooth Mouse M336/M337/M535 Mouse as
> > /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb1/1-7/1-
> > 7:1.0/bluetooth/hci0/hci0:1/0005:046D:B016.0001/input/input14
> > [   36.728036] input: Bluetooth Mouse M336/M337/M535 Consumer
> > Control as /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb1/1-7/1-
> > 7:1.0/bluetooth/hci0/hci0:1/0005:046D:B016.0001/input/input15
> > [   36.728823] input: Bluetooth Mouse M336/M337/M535 Keyboard as
> > /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb1/1-7/1-
> > 7:1.0/bluetooth/hci0/hci0:1/0005:046D:B016.0001/input/input18
> > [   36.731550] hid-generic 0005:046D:B016.0001: input,hidraw0:
> > BLUETOOTH HID v12.03 Mouse [Bluetooth Mouse M336/M337/M535] on
> > 9c:b6:d0:96:8e:c8
> > [   36.833039] logitech-hidpp-device 0005:046D:B016.0001: unknown
> > main item tag 0x0
> > [   36.999064] logitech-hidpp-device 0005:046D:B016.0001: Device
> > not connected
> >
> > and here's what I get with it:
> >
> > [   43.642546] Bluetooth: HIDP (Human Interface Emulation) ver 1.2
> > [   43.642559] Bluetooth: HIDP socket layer initialized
> > [   43.652898] hid-generic 0005:046D:B016.0001: unknown main item
> > tag 0x0
> > [   43.653833] input: Bluetooth Mouse M336/M337/M535 Mouse as
> > /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb1/1-7/1-
> > 7:1.0/bluetooth/hci0/hci0:1/0005:046D:B016.0001/input/input14
> > [   43.655025] input: Bluetooth Mouse M336/M337/M535 Consumer
> > Control as /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb1/1-7/1-
> > 7:1.0/bluetooth/hci0/hci0:1/0005:046D:B016.0001/input/input15
> > [   43.655400] input: Bluetooth Mouse M336/M337/M535 Keyboard as
> > /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb1/1-7/1-
> > 7:1.0/bluetooth/hci0/hci0:1/0005:046D:B016.0001/input/input18
> > [   43.657521] hid-generic 0005:046D:B016.0001: input,hidraw0:
> > BLUETOOTH HID v12.03 Mouse [Bluetooth Mouse M336/M337/M535] on
> > 9c:b6:d0:96:8e:c8
> >
> > The only difference seems to be that in the former case the
> > logitech-hidpp
> > driver tries to bind to the device, but I guess that is expected. 
> > However,
> > when the device ID is added to unhandled_hidpp_devices[], the
> > messages look
> > exactly like in the "good" case, but the mouse still doesn't work.
>
> Here's what happens.
>
> - The logitech-hidpp driver is modular and is not present initially,
> so hid-generic probes first (successfully).
>
> - logitech-hidpp is loaded which causes the device to be reporobed
> due
> to __hid_bus_driver_added().
>
> - Because the ->match() callback in hid-generic returns 0 for the
> device now, it is unbound from the device.
>
> - The probing of logitech-hidpp fails (due to an error in ->probe()).
>
> - The probing of hid-generic fails due to the failing ->match().
>
> So in order for unhandled_hidpp_devices[] in logitech-hidpp to work
> with hid-generic, __check_hid_generic() needs to be amended with a
> change to run the ->match() callback of the "specific" driver being
> tried.
>
> I have a working patch for this that will be sent shortly.

I'm glad my belated questioning of the hid-generic fallback code was
correct ;)

My question about getting the output from the HID++ tool still stands
though.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-12-07 10:08    [W:0.102 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site