Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 7 Dec 2022 12:43:13 -0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/1] HID: uclogic: Add HID_QUIRK_HIDINPUT_FORCE quirk | From | Alexander Zhang <> |
| |
On 12/7/22 3:09 AM, José Expósito wrote: > Hi Alexander, > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 04:49:10PM -0800, Alexander Zhang wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On 11/19/22 11:01 PM, Alexander Zhang wrote: >>> On 11/14/22 6:10 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote: >>>> On Thu, 10 Nov 2022, Alexander Zhang wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi José, >>>>> >>>>> On 11/10/22 9:40 AM, José Expósito wrote: >>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> About 3 months ago, Torge Matthies sent a patch fixing an issue with >>>>>> his XP-Pen Star G640 [1]. >>>>>> >>>>>> His patch changes the IS_INPUT_APPLICATION() macro to accept >>>>>> HID_DG_DIGITIZER. However, it looks like it is not being merged because >>>>>> of the possible side effects that changing that macro could generate. >>>>>> >>>>>> This patch aims to fix the same issue but using a more conservative >>>>>> approach hoping that the bug can be fixed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Torge, Alexander, could you test it and confirm that it fixes your >>>>>> issues, please? >>>>> >>>>> I tested the patch on commit 4bbf3422df78 and it fixes the issue. >>>> >>>> I will add >>>> >>>> Tested-by: Alexander Zhang <alex@alexyzhang.dev> >>>> >>>> to the commit; please speak up if you disagree. >>> >>> I'm not sure if you're still waiting for a response from me but I'm fine >>> with that. >> >> Is there something preventing this patch from being merged? I'm not very >> familiar with the kernel development process. > > The patch is already applied in the for-next branch, you can find it here: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/hid/hid.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=3405a4beaaa8
I see, thank you very much!
Best, Alexander Zhang
| |