lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 13/13] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8295-adp: Enable DP instances
From


On 05/12/2022 21:02, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 07:09:45PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 05/12/2022 18:44, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8295p-adp.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8295p-adp.dts
> [..]
>>> +&mdss0_dp2 {
>>> + status = "okay";
>> status should go last.
>>
>
> Thanks for pointing that out. Would be nice if the computer told me
> that...somehow...
>
>>> +
>>> + data-lanes = <0 1 2 3>;
>>> +
>>> + ports {
>>> + port@1 {
>>> + reg = <1>;
>>> + mdss0_dp2_phy_out: endpoint {
>> That's quite a lot of indentation.. couldn't these endpoints be defined in
>> the SoC DT?
>>
>
> The alternative would be to have the description of each DP controller
> split over multiple nodes and rely on the reader to stitch together the
> view of the node based on the label.
> Based on the naming of these labels they would at least be adjacent, so
> it wouldn't be that bad.
>
> But I feel that there is enough DP-controller nodes in this board
> already; I've yet to describe the two USB Type-C controllers or the two
> DSI-DP bridges.
> So I don't know if it's worth optimizing indentation-level within each
> node like this.
>
>
> And we will end up mixing this optimization between DP controllers, USB
> Type-C nodes, QMP nodes, DSI-DP bridges.
Oh okay, I see, let's keep it as-is then.

Konrad
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-12-05 21:10    [W:0.059 / U:0.860 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site