Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 28 Dec 2022 11:47:25 -0500 | From | Demi Marie Obenour <> | Subject | Re: [oss-security] [patch] proc.5: tell how to parse /proc/*/stat correctly |
| |
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 10:24:58AM -0500, Shawn Webb wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 04:44:49PM -0800, Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM) wrote: > > Dominique Martinet writes: > > > > > But, really, I just don't see how this can practically be said to be parsable... > > > > In its current form it never will be. The solution is to place > > this variable-length field last. Then you can "cut -d ' ' -f 51-" > > to get the command+args part (assuming I counted all those fields > > correctly ...) > > > > Of course, this breaks backwards compatability. > > It would also break forwards compatibility in the case new fields > needed to be added. > > The only solution would be a libxo-style feature wherein a > machine-parseable format is exposed by virtue of a file extension. > > Examples: > > 1. /proc/pid/stats.json > 2. /proc/pid/stats.xml > 3. /proc/pid/stats.yaml_shouldnt_be_a_thing
A binary format would be even better. No risk of ambiguity. -- Sincerely, Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers) Invisible Things Lab [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |