lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Dec]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 00/10] Add CA enforcement keyring restrictions
    From
    Date
    On Fri, 2022-12-23 at 18:17 +0000, Eric Snowberg wrote:
    > >> Fair enough. If this will be viewed as justification for adding the additional
    > >> code, I can work on adding it. Above you mentioned a warning would be needed
    > >> at a minimum and a restriction could be placed behind a Kconfig. How about for
    > >> the default case I add the warning and when compiling with
    > >> INTEGRITY_CA_MACHINE_KEYRING the restriction will be enforced.
    > >
    > > Sounds good to me. To avoid misunderstandings, will there be a Kconfig
    > > menu with 3 options?
    >
    > I will add the three options in the next round.
    >
    > > There were a couple of other comments having to
    > > do with variable names. Will you address them as well?
    >
    > And take care of the variable name changes. I won’t get back to this until January.

    Enjoy your vacation and the holidays. Looking forward to the next
    version.

    --
    thanks,

    Mimi

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2023-03-26 23:19    [W:3.814 / U:0.004 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site