Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 22 Dec 2022 09:23:53 +0100 | From | Marijn Suijten <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Document smmu-500 binding for SM6125 |
| |
On 2022-12-20 10:52:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 19/12/2022 20:28, Marijn Suijten wrote: > > On 2022-12-19 10:09:03, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 19/12/2022 10:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>> On 16/12/2022 22:58, Marijn Suijten wrote: > >>>> From: Martin Botka <martin.botka@somainline.org> > >>>> > >>>> Document smmu-500 compatibility with the SM6125 SoC. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > >> > >> Wait, not entirely... no constraints for clocks and regs? > > > > Quite odd that there is no warning for my DT patch as it clearly > > requires at least one clock...
Again, any idea why there's no warning for this DT mismatching minItems: 1 for clocks, clock-names and power-domains?
> > Irrespective of that downstream doesn't define any (nor power domains). > > How should we proceed? > > Binding now has constraints for clocks so at least that should be added > to your variant.
And that should be:
clock-names: false clocks: false power-domains: false
Because this board does declare have any, at least not when going off of downstream DT?
- Marijn
| |