Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 22 Dec 2022 13:20:00 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PULL] Networking for next-6.1 #forregzbot | From | Thorsten Leemhuis <> |
| |
On 21.12.22 12:30, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > [Note: this mail contains only information for Linux kernel regression > tracking. Mails like these contain '#forregzbot' in the subject to make > then easy to spot and filter out. The author also tried to remove most > or all individuals from the list of recipients to spare them the hassle.] > > On 16.12.22 11:49, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> >> On 04. 10. 22, 7:20, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >>> Joanne Koong (7): >> >>> net: Add a bhash2 table hashed by port and address >> >> This makes regression tests of python-ephemeral-port-reserve to fail. > > Thanks for the report. To be sure below issue doesn't fall through the > cracks unnoticed, I'm adding it to regzbot, my Linux kernel regression > tracking bot: > > #regzbot ^introduced 28044fc1d495 > #regzbot title new: regression tests of python-ephemeral-port-reserve fail > #regzbot ignore-activity
#regzbot monitor: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221221151258.25748-1-kuniyu@amazon.com/ #regzbot fix: tcp: Add TIME_WAIT sockets in bhash2
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I deal with a lot of reports and sometimes miss something important when writing mails like this. If that's the case here, don't hesitate to tell me in a public reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight.
| |