lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/2] docs: remoteproc: Update section header name requirement
From

On 12/15/2022 12:55 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Thanks for your time Phil!!!
> On 13/12/22 10:48, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:
>> Add section header name requirement specification in elf segments.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst
>> b/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst
>> index 348ee7e..3125030 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst
>> @@ -245,6 +245,8 @@ if the remote processor is accessing memory
>> directly).
>>     In addition to the standard ELF segments, most remote processors
>> would
>>   also include a special section which we call "the resource table".
>> +This resource table section name may have anything appended after it,
>> +but it must start with ".resource_table"
>
> What do you think of:
>
>    In addition to the standard ELF segments, most remote processors would
>    also include a special section which we call the "resource table".
>    A "resource table" section name must start with the ".resource_table"
>    prefix, optionally having a more descriptive string appended. For
>    example, ".resource_table.my_rproc" is a valid section name.
Okay. Will change accordingly and re-spin the patch set.
>
> Regards,
>
> Phil.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-26 23:15    [W:0.048 / U:1.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site