Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 20 Dec 2022 12:57:35 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] docs: remoteproc: Update section header name requirement | From | Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <> |
| |
On 12/15/2022 12:55 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: Thanks for your time Phil!!! > On 13/12/22 10:48, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote: >> Add section header name requirement specification in elf segments. >> >> Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@quicinc.com> >> --- >> Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst >> b/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst >> index 348ee7e..3125030 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst >> +++ b/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst >> @@ -245,6 +245,8 @@ if the remote processor is accessing memory >> directly). >> In addition to the standard ELF segments, most remote processors >> would >> also include a special section which we call "the resource table". >> +This resource table section name may have anything appended after it, >> +but it must start with ".resource_table" > > What do you think of: > > In addition to the standard ELF segments, most remote processors would > also include a special section which we call the "resource table". > A "resource table" section name must start with the ".resource_table" > prefix, optionally having a more descriptive string appended. For > example, ".resource_table.my_rproc" is a valid section name. Okay. Will change accordingly and re-spin the patch set. > > Regards, > > Phil.
| |