Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:21:43 -0500 | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] tracing/selftests: Add test for event filtering on function name |
| |
On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 17:20:39 -0700 Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On 12/19/22 15:35, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 15:11:39 -0700 > > Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > >> On 12/19/22 13:57, Ross Zwisler wrote: > >>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 01:31:08PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > >>>> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org> > >>>> > >>>> With the new filter logic of passing in the name of a function to match an > >>>> instruction pointer (or the address of the function), add a test to make > >>>> sure that it is functional. > >>>> > >>>> This is also the first test to test plain filtering. The filtering has > >>>> been tested via the trigger logic, which uses the same code, but there was > >>>> nothing to test just the event filter, so this test is the first to add > >>>> such a case. > >>>> > >>>> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> > >>>> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> > >>>> Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org > >>>> Suggested-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> > >>> > >>> Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com> > >> > >> Thank you both. I will apply this after rc1 comes out. > > > > It's dependent on the first patch. > > > > In which case, > > Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> >
Thanks Shuah!
-- Steve
| |