lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Dec]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 1/8] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: mmsys: Add support for MT8195 VPPSYS
From
On 19/12/2022 16:17, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
>
> On 19/12/2022 14:44, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 3:49 AM Moudy Ho <moudy.ho@mediatek.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> For MT8195, VPPSYS0 and VPPSYS1 are 2 display pipes with
>>> hardware differences in power domains, clocks and subsystem counts,
>>> which should be determined by compatible names.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Moudy Ho <moudy.ho@mediatek.com>
>>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml | 5 ++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> This landed in today's linux-next causing the following binding
>> warnings. Is this a fix? Only fixes for 6.2 should be added during the
>> merge window.
>>
>
> No it's not a fix, it's queued for the next -rc phase. I didn't know of the
> limitation of linux-next only allowing fixes in the merge window.

Stephen asks for it every time. Now it is in separate email:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/20221213120359.47fc3cad@canb.auug.org.au/

Previously it was in each linux-next announcement:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/20220527164940.6ef5b25e@canb.auug.org.au/

>
> Actually the patch is wrong. It shouldn't include "mediatek,mt8195-mmsys" as
> fallback for mediatek,mt8195-vppsys[0,1].
>
> I'll revert the whole series from v6.2-tmp/dts64 and v6.2-tmp/soc

Thanks. Please, drop all material for next cycle from linux-next.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-12-19 16:31    [W:0.085 / U:0.184 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site