Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 16 Dec 2022 17:20:14 +0100 | From | Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: Add acquire semantics for rtmutex lock acquisition |
| |
On 2022-12-16 15:58:04 [+0000], Will Deacon wrote: > I guess bigeasy can give the weaker barrier a try if he has the time, but > otherwise we can leave the change as-is.
I can't give a try because I have no HW. All I contributed here so far was based on what you wrote in the previous email and then I spotted the lack of the barrier of any sorts and asked about it. I _would_ assume that the cmpxchg_barrier() here would work but I'm far from knowing. If the explicit barrier after the cmpxchg_relaxed() is what you two agree on and it is better/ cheaper/ more obvious then fine. Do it ;)
> Cheers, > > Will
Sebastian
| |