lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH -next resend v3] mm: hwposion: support recovery from ksm_might_need_to_copy()
From


On 2022/12/16 9:47, HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也) wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 08:05:23PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> When the kernel copy a page from ksm_might_need_to_copy(), but runs
>> into an uncorrectable error, it will crash since poisoned page is
>> consumed by kernel, this is similar to Copy-on-write poison recovery,
>
> Maybe you mean "this is similar to the issue recently fixed by
> Copy-on-write poison recovery."? And if this sentence ends here,
> please put "." instead of ",".

That what I mean, will update the changelog.
>
>> When an error is detected during the page copy, return VM_FAULT_HWPOISON
>> in do_swap_page(), and install a hwpoison entry in unuse_pte() when
>> swapoff, which help us to avoid system crash. Note, memory failure on
>> a KSM page will be skipped, but still call memory_failure_queue() to
>> be consistent with general memory failure process.
>
> Thank you for the work. I have a few comment below ...
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> v3 resend:
>> - enhance unuse_pte() if ksm_might_need_to_copy() return -EHWPOISON
>> - fix issue found by lkp
>>
>> mm/ksm.c | 8 ++++++--
>> mm/memory.c | 3 +++
>> mm/swapfile.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
>> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
>> index dd02780c387f..83e2f74ae7da 100644
>> --- a/mm/ksm.c
>> +++ b/mm/ksm.c
>> @@ -2629,8 +2629,12 @@ struct page *ksm_might_need_to_copy(struct page *page,
>> new_page = NULL;
>> }
>> if (new_page) {
>> - copy_user_highpage(new_page, page, address, vma);
>> -
>> + if (copy_mc_user_highpage(new_page, page, address, vma)) {
>> + put_page(new_page);
>> + new_page = ERR_PTR(-EHWPOISON);
>> + memory_failure_queue(page_to_pfn(page), 0);
>> + return new_page;
>
> Simply return ERR_PTR(-EHWPOISON)?

OK.

>
>> + }
>> SetPageDirty(new_page);
>> __SetPageUptodate(new_page);
>> __SetPageLocked(new_page);
>> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
>> index aad226daf41b..5b2c137dfb2a 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory.c
>> @@ -3840,6 +3840,9 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>> if (unlikely(!page)) {
>> ret = VM_FAULT_OOM;
>> goto out_page;
>> + } else if (unlikely(PTR_ERR(page) == -EHWPOISON)) {
>> + ret = VM_FAULT_HWPOISON;
>> + goto out_page;
>> }
>> folio = page_folio(page);
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
>> index 908a529bca12..0efb1c2c2415 100644
>> --- a/mm/swapfile.c
>> +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
>> @@ -1763,12 +1763,15 @@ static int unuse_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>> struct page *swapcache;
>> spinlock_t *ptl;
>> pte_t *pte, new_pte;
>> + bool hwposioned = false;
>> int ret = 1;
>>
>> swapcache = page;
>> page = ksm_might_need_to_copy(page, vma, addr);
>> if (unlikely(!page))
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> + else if (unlikely(PTR_ERR(page) == -EHWPOISON))
>> + hwposioned = true;
>>
>> pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
>> if (unlikely(!pte_same_as_swp(*pte, swp_entry_to_pte(entry)))) {
>> @@ -1776,15 +1779,19 @@ static int unuse_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> - if (unlikely(!PageUptodate(page))) {
>> - pte_t pteval;
>> + if (hwposioned || !PageUptodate(page)) {
>> + swp_entry_t swp_entry;
>>
>> dec_mm_counter(vma->vm_mm, MM_SWAPENTS);
>> - pteval = swp_entry_to_pte(make_swapin_error_entry());
>> - set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, addr, pte, pteval);
>> - swap_free(entry);
>> + if (hwposioned) {
>> + swp_entry = make_hwpoison_entry(swapcache);
>> + page = swapcache;
>
> This might work for the process accessing to the broken page, but ksm
> pages are likely to be shared by multiple processes, so it would be
> much nicer if you can convert all mapping entries for the error ksm page
> into hwpoisoned ones. Maybe in this thorough approach,
> hwpoison_user_mappings() is updated to call try_to_unmap() for ksm pages.
> But it's not necessary to do this together with applying mcsafe-memcpy,
> because recovery action and mcsafe-memcpy can be done independently.

Yes, the memory failure won't handle KSM page (commit 01e00f880ca7
"HWPOISON: fix oops on ksm pages"), we could support it later,

>
> Thanks,
> Naoya Horiguchi
>
>> + } else {
>> + swp_entry = make_swapin_error_entry();
>> + }
>> + new_pte = swp_entry_to_pte(swp_entry);
>> ret = 0;
>> - goto out;
>> + goto setpte;
>> }
>>
>> /* See do_swap_page() */
>> @@ -1816,6 +1823,7 @@ static int unuse_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>> new_pte = pte_mksoft_dirty(new_pte);
>> if (pte_swp_uffd_wp(*pte))
>> new_pte = pte_mkuffd_wp(new_pte);
>> +setpte:
>> set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, addr, pte, new_pte);
>> swap_free(entry);
>> out:
>> --
>> 2.35.3
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-12-16 09:43    [W:0.096 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site