Messages in this thread | | | From | Dmitry Safonov <> | Date | Fri, 2 Dec 2022 00:37:51 +0000 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] jump_label: Prevent key->enabled int overflow |
| |
On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 23:36, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 23:17:11 +0000 Dmitry Safonov wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 22:31, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > I initially thought it has to go through tip trees because of the > > > > dependence, but as you say it's just one patch. > > > > > > > > I was also asked by Jakub on v4 to wait for Eric's Ack/Review, so once I > > > > get a go from him, I will send all 6 patches for inclusion into -net > > > > tree, if that will be in time before the merge window. > > > > > > Looks like we're all set on the networking side (thanks Eric!!) > > > > Thanks! > > > > > Should I pull Peter's branch? Or you want to just resent a patch Peter > > > already queued. A bit of an unusual situation.. > > > > Either way would work for me. > > I can send it in a couple of hours if you prefer instead of pulling the branch. > > I prefer to pull, seems safer in case Peter does get another patch. > > It's this one, right?
It is the correct one, yes.
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/log/?h=locking/core > > I'll pulled, I'll push out once the build is done.
Thank you once again, Dmitry
| |