Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 2 Dec 2022 02:57:53 +0300 | From | "Kirill A. Shutemov" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 13/16] x86: decouple PAT and MTRR handling |
| |
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 05:33:28PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 01.12.22 17:26, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 08:47:10AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > > > Today PAT is usable only with MTRR being active, with some nasty tweaks > > > to make PAT usable when running as Xen PV guest, which doesn't support > > > MTRR. > > > > > > The reason for this coupling is, that both, PAT MSR changes and MTRR > > > changes, require a similar sequence and so full PAT support was added > > > using the already available MTRR handling. > > > > > > Xen PV PAT handling can work without MTRR, as it just needs to consume > > > the PAT MSR setting done by the hypervisor without the ability and need > > > to change it. This in turn has resulted in a convoluted initialization > > > sequence and wrong decisions regarding cache mode availability due to > > > misguiding PAT availability flags. > > > > > > Fix all of that by allowing to use PAT without MTRR and by reworking > > > the current PAT initialization sequence to match better with the newly > > > introduced generic cache initialization. > > > > > > This removes the need of the recently added pat_force_disabled flag, so > > > remove the remnants of the patch adding it. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> > > > > This patch breaks boot for TDX guest. > > > > Kernel now tries to set CR0.CD which is forbidden in TDX guest[1] and > > causes #VE: > > > > tdx: Unexpected #VE: 28 > > VE fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI > > CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.1.0-rc1-00015-gadfe7512e1d0 #2646 > > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 > > RIP: 0010:native_write_cr0 (arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:427) > > Call Trace: > > <TASK> > > ? cache_disable (arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:173 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c:1085) > > ? cache_cpu_init (arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c:1132 (discriminator 3)) > > ? setup_arch (arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:1079) > > ? start_kernel (init/main.c:279 (discriminator 3) init/main.c:477 (discriminator 3) init/main.c:960 (discriminator 3)) > > ? load_ucode_bsp (arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c:155) > > ? secondary_startup_64_no_verify (arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S:358) > > </TASK> > > > > Any suggestion how to fix it? > > > > [1] Section 10.6.1. "CR0", https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/733568 > > What was the solution before? > > I guess MTRR was disabled, so there was no PAT, too?
Right:
Linus' tree:
[ 0.002589] last_pfn = 0x480000 max_arch_pfn = 0x10000000000 [ 0.003976] Disabled [ 0.004452] x86/PAT: MTRRs disabled, skipping PAT initialization too. [ 0.005856] CPU MTRRs all blank - virtualized system. [ 0.006915] x86/PAT: Configuration [0-7]: WB WT UC- UC WB WT UC- UC
tip/master:
[ 0.003443] last_pfn = 0x20b8e max_arch_pfn = 0x10000000000 [ 0.005220] Disabled [ 0.005818] x86/PAT: Configuration [0-7]: WB WC UC- UC WB WP UC- WT [ 0.007752] tdx: Unexpected #VE: 28
The dangling "Disabled" comes mtrr_bp_init().
> If this is the case, you can go the same route as Xen PV guests do.
Any reason X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR cannot be used instead of X86_FEATURE_XENPV there?
Do we have any virtualized platform that supports it?
-- Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
| |