lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/6] panic: Separate sysctl logic from CONFIG_SMP
On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 01:48:45PM -0800, Bill Wendling wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 12:01 PM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > In preparation for adding more sysctls directly in kernel/panic.c, split
> > CONFIG_SMP from the logic that adds sysctls.
> >
> > Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: tangmeng <tangmeng@uniontech.com>
> > Cc: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
> > Cc: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
> > Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > ---
> > kernel/panic.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/panic.c b/kernel/panic.c
> > index da323209f583..129936511380 100644
> > --- a/kernel/panic.c
> > +++ b/kernel/panic.c
> > @@ -75,8 +75,9 @@ ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD(panic_notifier_list);
> >
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(panic_notifier_list);
> >
> > -#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL)
> > +#if CONFIG_SYSCTL
>
> Should this be "#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL"?
>
> > static struct ctl_table kern_panic_table[] = {
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
>
> nit: This could be "#ifdef CONFIG_SMP"

Whoops, yes. Thanks. I'll fix these for v3.

--
Kees Cook

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-11-10 01:02    [W:0.114 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site