lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 2/2] bfq: ignore oom_bfqq in bfq_check_waker
Date
oom_bfqq is just a fallback bfqq, so shouldn't be used with waker
detection.

Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>
---
block/bfq-iosched.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index ca04ec868c40..267baf84870f 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -2135,7 +2135,9 @@ static void bfq_check_waker(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
if (!bfqd->last_completed_rq_bfqq ||
bfqd->last_completed_rq_bfqq == bfqq ||
bfq_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq) ||
- now_ns - bfqd->last_completion >= 4 * NSEC_PER_MSEC)
+ now_ns - bfqd->last_completion >= 4 * NSEC_PER_MSEC ||
+ bfqd->last_completed_rq_bfqq == &bfqd->oom_bfqq ||
+ bfqq == &bfqd->oom_bfqq)
return;

/*
--
2.38.1.431.g37b22c650d-goog
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-11-08 19:11    [W:1.062 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site