lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: Coverity: gpmc_is_valid_waitpin(): Control flow issues
From
On 08/11/2022 09:15, Niedermayr, BENEDIKT wrote:

>>> Another alternative with less churn is to leave them as u32
>>> but make GPMC_WAITPIN_INVALID set to a large positive number.
>> Ok, I will fix that.
>> Do I need to send a new fix-patch on top the current patch series?
>> Or should I just send only the bugfix-patch for the coverity-bot?
>>
> Sorry, another Question:
> Is it somehow possible to check locally if the bugfix actually fixed the bug, before I submit the patch?

I think only if you have Coverity somewhere in your company set for
testing kernel...

Best regards,
Krzysztof

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-11-08 10:41    [W:0.038 / U:1.572 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site