Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Anna-Maria Behnsen <> | Subject | [PATCH v4 09/16] timer: Split out "get next timer interrupt" functionality | Date | Fri, 4 Nov 2022 15:57:30 +0100 |
| |
forward_and_idle_timer_bases() includes the functionality for getting the next timer interrupt. To reuse it, it is splitted into an separate function "get_next_timer_interrupt()".
This is preparatory work for the conversion of the NOHZ timer placement to a pull at expiry time model. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de> --- v4: Fix typo in comment --- kernel/time/timer.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c index 680a0760e30d..853089febf83 100644 --- a/kernel/time/timer.c +++ b/kernel/time/timer.c @@ -1704,6 +1704,46 @@ static unsigned long next_timer_interrupt(struct timer_base *base) return base->next_expiry; } +static unsigned long get_next_timer_interrupt(struct timer_base *base_local, + struct timer_base *base_global, + unsigned long basej, u64 basem, + struct timer_events *tevt) +{ + unsigned long nextevt_local, nextevt_global; + bool local_first; + + nextevt_local = next_timer_interrupt(base_local); + nextevt_global = next_timer_interrupt(base_global); + + /* + * Check whether the local event is expiring before or at the same + * time as the global event. + * + * Note, that nextevt_global and nextevt_local might be based on + * different base->clk values. So it's not guaranteed that + * comparing with empty bases results in a correct local_first. + */ + if (base_local->timers_pending && base_global->timers_pending) + local_first = time_before_eq(nextevt_local, nextevt_global); + else + local_first = base_local->timers_pending; + + /* + * Update tevt->* values: + * + * If the local queue expires first, then the global event can + * be ignored. If the global queue is empty, nothing to do + * either. + */ + if (!local_first && base_global->timers_pending) + tevt->global = basem + (u64)(nextevt_global - basej) * TICK_NSEC; + + if (base_local->timers_pending) + tevt->local = basem + (u64)(nextevt_local - basej) * TICK_NSEC; + + return local_first ? nextevt_local : nextevt_global; +} + /* * Forward base clock is done only when @basej is past base->clk, otherwise * base-clk might be rewind. @@ -1738,7 +1778,7 @@ void forward_and_idle_timer_bases(unsigned long basej, u64 basem, { unsigned long nextevt, nextevt_local, nextevt_global; struct timer_base *base_local, *base_global; - bool local_first, is_idle; + bool is_idle; /* Preset local / global events */ tevt->local = tevt->global = KTIME_MAX; @@ -1756,8 +1796,11 @@ void forward_and_idle_timer_bases(unsigned long basej, u64 basem, raw_spin_lock(&base_local->lock); raw_spin_lock_nested(&base_global->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); - nextevt_local = next_timer_interrupt(base_local); - nextevt_global = next_timer_interrupt(base_global); + nextevt = get_next_timer_interrupt(base_local, base_global, + basej, basem, tevt); + + nextevt_local = base_local->next_expiry; + nextevt_global = base_global->next_expiry; /* * We have a fresh next event. Check whether we can forward the @@ -1766,21 +1809,6 @@ void forward_and_idle_timer_bases(unsigned long basej, u64 basem, forward_base_clk(base_local, nextevt_local, basej); forward_base_clk(base_global, nextevt_global, basej); - /* - * Check whether the local event is expiring before or at the same - * time as the global event. - * - * Note, that nextevt_global and nextevt_local might be based on - * different base->clk values. So it's not guaranteed that - * comparing with empty bases results in a correct local_first. - */ - if (base_local->timers_pending && base_global->timers_pending) - local_first = time_before_eq(nextevt_local, nextevt_global); - else - local_first = base_local->timers_pending; - - nextevt = local_first ? nextevt_local : nextevt_global; - /* * Bases are idle if the next event is more than a tick away. Also * the tick is stopped so any added timer must forward the base clk @@ -1793,43 +1821,24 @@ void forward_and_idle_timer_bases(unsigned long basej, u64 basem, /* We need to mark both bases in sync */ base_local->is_idle = base_global->is_idle = is_idle; + raw_spin_unlock(&base_global->lock); + raw_spin_unlock(&base_local->lock); + /* * If the bases are not marked idle, i.e one of the events is at * max. one tick away, then the CPU can't go into a NOHZ idle * sleep. Use the earlier event of both and store it in the local * expiry value. The next global event is irrelevant in this case - * and can be left as KTIME_MAX. CPU will wakeup on time. + * and can be reset as KTIME_MAX. CPU will wakeup on time. */ if (!is_idle) { /* If we missed a tick already, force 0 delta */ if (time_before(nextevt, basej)) nextevt = basej; tevt->local = basem + (u64)(nextevt - basej) * TICK_NSEC; - goto unlock; + tevt->global = KTIME_MAX; } - /* - * If the bases are marked idle, i.e. the next event on both the - * local and the global queue are farther away than a tick, - * evaluate both bases. No need to check whether one of the bases - * has an already expired timer as this is caught by the !is_idle - * condition above. - */ - if (base_local->timers_pending) - tevt->local = basem + (u64)(nextevt_local - basej) * TICK_NSEC; - - /* - * If the local queue expires first, then the global event can be - * ignored. The CPU wakes up before that. If the global queue is - * empty, nothing to do either. - */ - if (!local_first && base_global->timers_pending) - tevt->global = basem + (u64)(nextevt_global - basej) * TICK_NSEC; - -unlock: - raw_spin_unlock(&base_global->lock); - raw_spin_unlock(&base_local->lock); - cmp_next_hrtimer_event(basem, tevt); } -- 2.30.2
| |