lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 3/4] perf build: Use libtraceevent from the system
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 11:05 AM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 10:30 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > Remove the LIBTRACEEVENT_DYNAMIC and LIBTRACEFS_DYNAMIC. If
> > libtraceevent isn't installed or NO_LIBTRACEEVENT=1 is passed to the
> > build, don't compile in libtraceevent and libtracefs support. This
> > also disables CONFIG_TRACE that controls "perf
> > trace". CONFIG_TRACEEVENT is used to control enablement in
> > Build/Makefiles, HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT is used in C code. Without
> > HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT tracepoints are disabled and as such the commands
> > kmem, kwork, lock, sched and timechart are removed. The majority of
> > commands continue to work including "perf test".
>
> Maybe we can have a different approach. I guess the trace data
> access is isolated then we can make dummy interfaces when there's
> no libtraceevent. This way we don't need to touch every command
> and let it fail when it's asked.

Sounds like a worthwhile refactor that can land on top of this change.

> The motivation is that we should be able to run the sub-commands
> as much as possible. In fact, we could run 'record' part only on the
> target machine and pass the data to the host for analysis with a
> full-fledged perf. Also some commands like 'perf lock contention'
> can run with or without libtraceevent (using BPF only).

The issue here is that perf lock contention will use evsel__new_tp and
internally that uses libtraceevent. As such it is removed without
HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT. Without the evsel there's not much perf lock
contention can do, so rather than litter the code with
HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT and for it to be broken, I made the choice just to
remove it from the no libtraceevent build for now.

I think it is worth pursuing these patches in the shape they are in so
that we can land the removal of tools/lib/traceevent and ensure the
migration away from an out-of-date version of that library.

Thanks,
Ian

> Thanks,
> Namhyung

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-11-30 21:18    [W:0.058 / U:0.596 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site