lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC 09/10] mm/hugetlb: Make hugetlb_fault() RCU-safe
On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 11:04:01AM -0700, James Houghton wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 2:30 PM Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > RCU makes sure the pte_t* won't go away from under us. Please refer to the
> > comment above huge_pte_offset() for more information.
>
> Thanks for this series, Peter! :)

Thanks for reviewing, James!

>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > mm/hugetlb.c | 6 +++++-
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > index 5dc87e4e6780..6d336d286394 100644
> > --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> > +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > @@ -5822,6 +5822,8 @@ vm_fault_t hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > int need_wait_lock = 0;
> > unsigned long haddr = address & huge_page_mask(h);
> >
> > + /* For huge_pte_offset() */
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > ptep = huge_pte_offset(mm, haddr, huge_page_size(h));
> > if (ptep) {
> > /*
> > @@ -5830,13 +5832,15 @@ vm_fault_t hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > * not actually modifying content here.
> > */
> > entry = huge_ptep_get(ptep);
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > if (unlikely(is_hugetlb_entry_migration(entry))) {
> > migration_entry_wait_huge(vma, ptep);
>
> ptep is used here (and we dereference it in
> `__migration_entry_wait_huge`), so this looks unsafe to me. A simple
> way to fix this would be to move the migration entry check after the
> huge_pte_alloc call.

Right, I definitely overlooked the migration entries in both patches
(including the previous one that you commented), thanks for pointing that
out.

Though moving that after huge_pte_alloc() may have similar problem, iiuc.
The thing is we need either the vma lock or rcu to protect accessing the
pte*, while the pte* page and its pgtable lock can be accessed very deep
into the migration core (e.g., migration_entry_wait_on_locked()) as the
lock cannot be released before the thread queues itself into the waitqueue.

So far I don't see a good way to achieve this but add a hook to
migration_entry_wait_on_locked() so that any lock held for huge migrations
can be properly released after the pgtable lock released but before the
thread yields itself.

--
Peter Xu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-11-03 16:41    [W:0.095 / U:0.776 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site