Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 3 Nov 2022 11:07:28 +0100 | From | Borislav Petkov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86/perf: Fixed kernel panic during boot on Nano processor. |
| |
On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 11:23:04AM +0800, silviazhao-oc wrote: > Nano processor may not fully support rdpmc instruction,
What does that even mean? Not fully support?
> it works well for reading general pmc counter, but will lead > GP(general protection) when accessing fixed pmc counter.
RDPMC will #GP when the perf counter specified cannot be read.
AFAICT, that is RCX: 0000000040000001 which looks like perf counter index 1 with INTEL_PMC_FIXED_RDPMC_BASE ORed in.
> Furthermore, family/mode information is same between Nano processor > and ZX-C processor, it leads to zhaoxin pmu driver is wrongly loaded > for Nano processor, which resulting boot kernal fail.
So *that* is the real problem - it tries to access perf counters thinking it is running on architectural perf counters implementation but nano doesn't have that.
> To solve this problem, stepping information will be checked to distinguish > between Nano processor and ZX-C processor.
Why doesn't that ZXC thing doesn't have a CPUID flag to check instead of looking at models and steppings and thus confusing it with a nano CPU?
> [https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212389] > > Reported-by: Arjan <8vvbbqzo567a@nospam.xutrox.com>
Does Arjan have a last name?
> Signed-off-by: silviazhao-oc <silviazhao-oc@zhaoxin.com>
I'm assuming your name is properly spelled "Silvia Zhao" and not in a single word with a "-oc" string appended at the end, yes?
Thx.
-- Regards/Gruss, Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
| |