lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4,bpf-next] bpf: Don't redirect packets with invalid pkt_len
On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 2:07 PM Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> On 7/15/22 4:55 AM, Zhengchao Shao wrote:
> > Syzbot found an issue [1]: fq_codel_drop() try to drop a flow whitout any
> > skbs, that is, the flow->head is null.
> > The root cause, as the [2] says, is because that bpf_prog_test_run_skb()
> > run a bpf prog which redirects empty skbs.
> > So we should determine whether the length of the packet modified by bpf
> > prog or others like bpf_prog_test is valid before forwarding it directly.
> >
> > LINK: [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=0b84da80c2917757915afa89f7738a9d16ec96c5
> > LINK: [2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg777503.html
> >
> > Reported-by: syzbot+7a12909485b94426aceb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > v3: modify debug print
> > v2: need move checking to convert___skb_to_skb and add debug info
> > v1: should not check len in fast path
> >
> > include/linux/skbuff.h | 8 ++++++++
> > net/bpf/test_run.c | 3 +++
> > net/core/dev.c | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> > index f6a27ab19202..82e8368ba6e6 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> > @@ -2459,6 +2459,14 @@ static inline void skb_set_tail_pointer(struct sk_buff *skb, const int offset)
> >
> > #endif /* NET_SKBUFF_DATA_USES_OFFSET */
> >
> > +static inline void skb_assert_len(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_NET
> > + if (WARN_ONCE(!skb->len, "%s\n", __func__))
> > + DO_ONCE_LITE(skb_dump, KERN_ERR, skb, false);
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_NET */
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Add data to an sk_buff
> > */
> > diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> > index 2ca96acbc50a..dc9dc0bedca0 100644
> > --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
> > +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> > @@ -955,6 +955,9 @@ static int convert___skb_to_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct __sk_buff *__skb)
> > {
> > struct qdisc_skb_cb *cb = (struct qdisc_skb_cb *)skb->cb;
> >
> > + if (!skb->len)
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> From another recent report [0], I don't think this change is fixing the report
> from syzbot. It probably makes sense to revert this patch.
>
> afaict, This '!skb->len' test is done after
> if (is_l2)
> __skb_push(skb, hh_len);
>
> Hence, skb->len is not zero in convert___skb_to_skb(). The proper place to test
> skb->len is before __skb_push() to ensure there is some network header after the
> mac or may as well ensure "data_size_in > ETH_HLEN" at the beginning.

When is_l2==true, __skb_push will result in non-zero skb->len, so we
should be good, right?
The only issue is when we do bpf_redirect into a tunneling device and
do __skb_pull, but that's now fixed by [0].

When is_l2==false, the existing check in convert___skb_to_skb will
make sure there is something in the l3 headers.

So it seems like this patch is still needed. Or am I missing something?

> The fix in [0] is applied. If it turns out there are other cases caused by the
> skb generated by test_run that needs extra fixes in bpf_redirect_*, it needs to
> revisit an earlier !skb->len check mentioned above and the existing test cases
> outside of test_progs would have to adjust accordingly.
>
> [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221027225537.353077-1-sdf@google.com/
>
> > +
> > if (!__skb)
> > return 0;
> >
> > diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> > index d588fd0a54ce..716df64fcfa5 100644
> > --- a/net/core/dev.c
> > +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> > @@ -4168,6 +4168,7 @@ int __dev_queue_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *sb_dev)
> > bool again = false;
> >
> > skb_reset_mac_header(skb);
> > + skb_assert_len(skb);
> >
> > if (unlikely(skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_SCHED_TSTAMP))
> > __skb_tstamp_tx(skb, NULL, NULL, skb->sk, SCM_TSTAMP_SCHED);
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-11-03 22:37    [W:0.126 / U:0.316 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site