lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 11/12] riscv: Add the Allwinner SoC family Kconfig option
Date
Am Sonntag, 27. November 2022, 12:31:15 CET schrieb Guo Ren:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 12:36 AM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 05:46:55PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> > > Allwinner manufactures the sunxi family of application processors. This
> > > includes the "sun8i" series of ARMv7 SoCs, the "sun50i" series of ARMv8
> > > SoCs, and now the "sun20i" series of 64-bit RISC-V SoCs.
> > >
> > > The first SoC in the sun20i series is D1, containing a single T-HEAD
> > > C906 core. D1s is a low-pin-count variant of D1 with co-packaged DRAM.
> > >
> > > Most peripherals are shared across the entire chip family. In fact, the
> > > ARMv7 T113 SoC is pin-compatible and almost entirely register-compatible
> > > with the D1s.
> > >
> > > This means many existing device drivers can be reused. To facilitate
> > > this reuse, name the symbol ARCH_SUNXI, since that is what the existing
> > > drivers have as their dependency.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> > > Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changes in v2:
> > > - Sort Kconfig as if we had done s/SOC_/ARCH_/ for future-proofing
> > >
> > > arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs | 9 +++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs b/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs
> > > index 69774bb362d6..4c1dc2ca11f9 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs
> > > @@ -26,6 +26,15 @@ config SOC_STARFIVE
> > > help
> > > This enables support for StarFive SoC platform hardware.
> > >
> > > +config ARCH_SUNXI
> > > + bool "Allwinner sun20i SoCs"
> > > + select ERRATA_THEAD if MMU && !XIP_KERNEL
>
> depend on MMU
> depend on !XIP_KERNEL
> select ERRATA_THEAD

That sounds like a better variant.

The D1 / C906 _needs_ the errata for the memory handling
and the other alternative constraints require the !XIP

With the select, a xip-kernel would not boot at all on a D1


Heiko


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-11-28 22:06    [W:0.144 / U:0.312 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site