lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 05/10] dt-bindings: soc: mediatek: convert pwrap documentation
From
On 27/11/2022 14:04, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 25/11/2022 16:10, Alexandre Mergnat wrote:
>> - Convert soc/mediatek/pwrap.txt to soc/mediatek/mediatek,pwrap.yaml
>> - Add syscon compatible const for mt8186 and mt8195 to match the DTS needs.
>>
>> + resets:
>> + minItems: 1
>> + items:
>> + - description: PMIC wrapper reset
>> + - description: IP pairing reset
>> +
>> + reset-names:
>> + minItems: 1
>> + items:
>> + - const: pwrap
>> + - const: pwrap-bridge
>> +
>> + pmic:
>> + type: object
>
> What's here? Other schema? If not then maybe compatible? What about
> description?

I guess this was comment from Rob, so it's fine.

>
>> +
>> +required:
>> + - compatible
>> + - reg
>> + - reg-names
>> + - interrupts
>> + - clocks
>> + - clock-names
>> +
>> +dependentRequired:
>> + resets: [reset-names]
>
> Drop.
>
>> +
>> +allOf:
>> + - if:
>> + properties:
>> + compatible:
>> + contains:
>> + const: mediatek,mt8365-pwrap
>> + then:
>> + properties:
>> + clocks:
>> + minItems: 4
>> +
>> + clock-names:
>> + minItems: 4
>
> else:
> ???

Actually this looks less complete than your previous patch.

else:
clocks:
maxItems: 2
same for clock-names

>
>> +
>> +additionalProperties: false
>> +
>> +examples:
>> + - |
>> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
>> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>> + #include <dt-bindings/reset/mt8135-resets.h>
>> +
>> + soc {
>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>> + pwrap@1000d000 {
>> + compatible = "mediatek,mt8135-pwrap";
>> + reg = <0 0x1000f000 0 0x1000>,
>
> This does not match your unit address. No warnings when compile testing?
>
>> + <0 0x11017000 0 0x1000>;
>> + reg-names = "pwrap", "pwrap-bridge";
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 128 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + clocks = <&clk26m>, <&clk26m>;
>> + clock-names = "spi", "wrap";
>> + resets = <&infracfg MT8135_INFRA_PMIC_WRAP_RST>,
>> + <&pericfg MT8135_PERI_PWRAP_BRIDGE_SW_RST>;
>> + reset-names = "pwrap", "pwrap-bridge";
>
> Missing pmic. Make your example complete.

Probably pmic should be skipped, I understand it is described in MFD
binding.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-11-27 14:13    [W:0.160 / U:0.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site