lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: soc: samsung: exynos-sysreg: split from syscon
From
On 25/11/2022 15:32, Sriranjani P wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski [mailto:krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org]
>> Sent: 25 November 2022 16:52
>> To: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>; Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>;
> Krzysztof
>> Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>; Alim Akhtar
>> <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
>> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> linux-samsung-
>> soc@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>; Sriranjani P
>> <sriranjani.p@samsung.com>; Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com>;
>> Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
>> Subject: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: soc: samsung: exynos-sysreg: split from
>> syscon
>>
>> Split Samsung Exynos SoC SYSREG bindings to own file to narrow the
> bindings
>> and do not allow other parts of syscon.yaml. This allows further
> customization
>> of Samsung SoC bindings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Cc: Sriranjani P <sriranjani.p@samsung.com>
>> Cc: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com>
>> Cc: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
>> ---
>
> We agree for add separate YAML for Samsung Exynos and hence I think we can
> go ahead and add separate yaml for Tesla FSD.
> Reviewed-by: Sriranjani P <sriranjani.p@samsung.com>

Tesla FSD should go to the same file. No need for another binding for
same design...

Best regards,
Krzysztof

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-11-26 14:09    [W:0.102 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site