lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] clk: rockchip: Fix memory leak in rockchip_clk_register_pll()
From
Date
Hi,

在 2022/11/23 17:01, Heiko Stuebner 写道:
> Hi,
>
> Am Mittwoch, 23. November 2022, 04:22:37 CET schrieb Xiu Jianfeng:
>> If clk_register() fails, @pll->rate_table may have allocated memory by
>> kmemdup(), so it needs to be freed, otherwise will cause memory leak
>> issue, this patch fixes it.
>>
>> Fixes: 90c590254051 ("clk: rockchip: add clock type for pll clocks and pll used on rk3066")
>> Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
>> index 4b9840994295..dc4ce280d125 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
>> @@ -1200,6 +1200,7 @@ struct clk *rockchip_clk_register_pll(struct rockchip_clk_provider *ctx,
>> clk_unregister(mux_clk);
>> mux_clk = pll_clk;
>> err_mux:
>> + kfree(pll->rate_table);
>
> I think this free needs to go up to the err_pll block.
>
> In the code it is
> - clk_register(pll_mux->hw) -> err_mux
> - kmemdup
> - clk_register(pll->hw) -> err_pll
>
> so the kfree for the rate-table should probably
> be at
> err_pll:
> kfree(rate_table)

Thanks for you review, I think here should be kfree(pll->rate_table)
instead of kfree(rate_table), because @rate_table is the intput param
while pll->rate_table is the new allocated memory.

v2 already sent.

> clk_unregister(mux_clk);
> ...
>
>
> Heiko
>
>> kfree(pll);
>> return mux_clk;
>> }
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> .
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-11-23 10:23    [W:0.050 / U:0.432 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site