Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] clk: rockchip: Fix memory leak in rockchip_clk_register_pll() | From | xiujianfeng <> | Date | Wed, 23 Nov 2022 17:21:05 +0800 |
| |
Hi,
在 2022/11/23 17:01, Heiko Stuebner 写道: > Hi, > > Am Mittwoch, 23. November 2022, 04:22:37 CET schrieb Xiu Jianfeng: >> If clk_register() fails, @pll->rate_table may have allocated memory by >> kmemdup(), so it needs to be freed, otherwise will cause memory leak >> issue, this patch fixes it. >> >> Fixes: 90c590254051 ("clk: rockchip: add clock type for pll clocks and pll used on rk3066") >> Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com> >> --- >> drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c >> index 4b9840994295..dc4ce280d125 100644 >> --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c >> +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c >> @@ -1200,6 +1200,7 @@ struct clk *rockchip_clk_register_pll(struct rockchip_clk_provider *ctx, >> clk_unregister(mux_clk); >> mux_clk = pll_clk; >> err_mux: >> + kfree(pll->rate_table); > > I think this free needs to go up to the err_pll block. > > In the code it is > - clk_register(pll_mux->hw) -> err_mux > - kmemdup > - clk_register(pll->hw) -> err_pll > > so the kfree for the rate-table should probably > be at > err_pll: > kfree(rate_table)
Thanks for you review, I think here should be kfree(pll->rate_table) instead of kfree(rate_table), because @rate_table is the intput param while pll->rate_table is the new allocated memory.
v2 already sent.
> clk_unregister(mux_clk); > ... > > > Heiko > >> kfree(pll); >> return mux_clk; >> } >> > > > > > > . >
| |