lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the rcu tree
From
Date


On 2022/11/23 13:32, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the rcu tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced
> these warnings:
>
> Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst:401: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found.
> Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst:428: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found.
> Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst:445: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found.
> Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst:459: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found.
> Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst:468: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found.
>
> Introduced by commit
>
> 3d2788ba4573 ("doc: Document CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_CPUTIME=y stall information")
>

Strange thing, I specially executed make htmldocs before, unexpectedly did not
find these warnings.

I already know why. The literal block is not indented. I will post a new version to
Paul E. McKenney. Excuse me for causing trouble to everyone.

For example:
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ In kernels built with CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_CPUTIME=y or booted with
rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_cputime=1, the following additional information
is supplied with each RCU CPU stall warning::

-rcu: hardirqs softirqs csw/system
-rcu: number: 624 45 0
-rcu: cputime: 69 1 2425 ==> 2500(ms)
+ rcu: hardirqs softirqs csw/system
+ rcu: number: 624 45 0
+ rcu: cputime: 69 1 2425 ==> 2500(ms)


--
Regards,
Zhen Lei

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-11-23 09:21    [W:0.048 / U:0.540 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site