lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 11/20] x86/virt/tdx: Add placeholder to construct TDMRs to cover all TDX memory regions
From
On 11/20/22 16:26, Kai Huang wrote:
> TDX provides increased levels of memory confidentiality and integrity.
> This requires special hardware support for features like memory
> encryption and storage of memory integrity checksums. Not all memory
> satisfies these requirements.
>
> As a result, the TDX introduced the concept of a "Convertible Memory

s/the TDX introduced/TDX introduces/

> Region" (CMR). During boot, the firmware builds a list of all of the
> memory ranges which can provide the TDX security guarantees. The list
> of these ranges is available to the kernel by querying the TDX module.
>
> The TDX architecture needs additional metadata to record things like
> which TD guest "owns" a given page of memory. This metadata essentially
> serves as the 'struct page' for the TDX module. The space for this
> metadata is not reserved by the hardware up front and must be allocated
> by the kernel and given to the TDX module.
>
> Since this metadata consumes space, the VMM can choose whether or not to
> allocate it for a given area of convertible memory. If it chooses not
> to, the memory cannot receive TDX protections and can not be used by TDX
> guests as private memory.
>
> For every memory region that the VMM wants to use as TDX memory, it sets
> up a "TD Memory Region" (TDMR). Each TDMR represents a physically
> contiguous convertible range and must also have its own physically
> contiguous metadata table, referred to as a Physical Address Metadata
> Table (PAMT), to track status for each page in the TDMR range.
>
> Unlike a CMR, each TDMR requires 1G granularity and alignment. To
> support physical RAM areas that don't meet those strict requirements,
> each TDMR permits a number of internal "reserved areas" which can be
> placed over memory holes. If PAMT metadata is placed within a TDMR it
> must be covered by one of these reserved areas.
>
> Let's summarize the concepts:
>
> CMR - Firmware-enumerated physical ranges that support TDX. CMRs are
> 4K aligned.
> TDMR - Physical address range which is chosen by the kernel to support
> TDX. 1G granularity and alignment required. Each TDMR has
> reserved areas where TDX memory holes and overlapping PAMTs can
> be put into.

s/put into/represented/

> PAMT - Physically contiguous TDX metadata. One table for each page size
> per TDMR. Roughly 1/256th of TDMR in size. 256G TDMR = ~1G
> PAMT.
>
> As one step of initializing the TDX module, the kernel configures
> TDX-usable memory regions by passing an array of TDMRs to the TDX module.
>
> Constructing the array of TDMRs consists below steps:
>
> 1) Create TDMRs to cover all memory regions that the TDX module can use;

Slight tweak:

1) Create TDMRs to cover all memory regions that the TDX module will use
for TD memory

The TDX module "uses" more memory than strictly the TMDR's.

> 2) Allocate and set up PAMT for each TDMR;
> 3) Set up reserved areas for each TDMR.

s/Set up/Designate/

> Add a placeholder to construct TDMRs to do the above steps after all
> TDX memory regions are verified to be truly convertible. Always free
> TDMRs at the end of the initialization (no matter successful or not)
> as TDMRs are only used during the initialization.

The changelog here actually looks really good to me so far.

> diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
> index 32af86e31c47..26048c6b0170 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
> @@ -445,6 +445,63 @@ static int build_tdx_memory(void)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/* Calculate the actual TDMR_INFO size */
> +static inline int cal_tdmr_size(void)

I think we can spare the bytes to add "culate" in the function name so
we don't think these are California TDMRs.

> +{
> + int tdmr_sz;
> +
> + /*
> + * The actual size of TDMR_INFO depends on the maximum number
> + * of reserved areas.
> + *
> + * Note: for TDX1.0 the max_reserved_per_tdmr is 16, and
> + * TDMR_INFO size is aligned up to 512-byte. Even it is
> + * extended in the future, it would be insane if TDMR_INFO
> + * becomes larger than 4K. The tdmr_sz here should never
> + * overflow.
> + */
> + tdmr_sz = sizeof(struct tdmr_info);
> + tdmr_sz += sizeof(struct tdmr_reserved_area) *
> + tdx_sysinfo.max_reserved_per_tdmr;

First, I think 'tdx_sysinfo' should probably be a local variable in
init_tdx_module() and have its address passed in here. Having global
variables always makes it more opaque about who is initializing it.

Second, if this code is making assumptions about
'max_reserved_per_tdmr', then let's actually add assertions or sanity
checks. For instance:

if (tdx_sysinfo.max_reserved_per_tdmr > MAX_TDMRS)
return -1;

or even:

if (tdmr_sz > PAGE_SIZE)
return -1;

It does almost no good to just assert what the limits are in a comment.

> + /*
> + * TDX requires each TDMR_INFO to be 512-byte aligned. Always
> + * round up TDMR_INFO size to the 512-byte boundary.
> + */

<sigh> More silly comments.

The place to document this is TDMR_INFO_ALIGNMENT. If anyone wants to
know what the alignment is, exactly, they can look at the definition.
They don't need to be told *TWICE* what TDMR_INFO_ALIGNMENT #defines to
in one comment.

> + return ALIGN(tdmr_sz, TDMR_INFO_ALIGNMENT);
> +}
> +
> +static struct tdmr_info *alloc_tdmr_array(int *array_sz)
> +{
> + /*
> + * TDX requires each TDMR_INFO to be 512-byte aligned.
> + * Use alloc_pages_exact() to allocate all TDMRs at once.
> + * Each TDMR_INFO will still be 512-byte aligned since
> + * cal_tdmr_size() always returns 512-byte aligned size.
> + */

OK, I think you're just trolling me now. Two *MORE* mentions of the
512-byte alignment?

> + *array_sz = cal_tdmr_size() * tdx_sysinfo.max_tdmrs;
> +
> + /*
> + * Zero the buffer so 'struct tdmr_info::size' can be
> + * used to determine whether a TDMR is valid.
> + *
> + * Note: for TDX1.0 the max_tdmrs is 64 and TDMR_INFO size
> + * is 512-byte. Even they are extended in the future, it
> + * would be insane if the total size exceeds 4MB.
> + */
> + return alloc_pages_exact(*array_sz, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> +}

This looks massively over complicated.

Get rid of this function entirely. Then create:

static int tdmr_array_size(void)
{
return tdmr_size_single() * tdx_sysinfo.max_tdmrs;
}

The *caller* can do:

tdmr_array = alloc_pages_exact(tdmr_array_size(),
GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
if (!tdmr_array) {
...

Then the error path is:

free_pages_exact(tdmr_array, tdmr_array_size());

Then, there are no size pointers going back and forth. Easy peasy. I'm
OK with a little arithmetic being repeated.

> +/*
> + * Construct an array of TDMRs to cover all TDX memory ranges.
> + * The actual number of TDMRs is kept to @tdmr_num.
> + */
> +static int construct_tdmrs(struct tdmr_info *tdmr_array, int *tdmr_num)
> +{
> + /* Return -EINVAL until constructing TDMRs is done */
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Detect and initialize the TDX module.
> *
> @@ -454,6 +511,9 @@ static int build_tdx_memory(void)
> */
> static int init_tdx_module(void)
> {
> + struct tdmr_info *tdmr_array;
> + int tdmr_array_sz;
> + int tdmr_num;

I tend to write these like:

"tdmr_num" is the number of *a* TDMR.

"nr_tdmrs" is the number of TDMRs.

> int ret;
>
> /*
> @@ -506,11 +566,34 @@ static int init_tdx_module(void)
> ret = build_tdx_memory();
> if (ret)
> goto out;
> +
> + /* Prepare enough space to construct TDMRs */
> + tdmr_array = alloc_tdmr_array(&tdmr_array_sz);
> + if (!tdmr_array) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out_free_tdx_mem;
> + }
> +
> + /* Construct TDMRs to cover all TDX memory ranges */
> + ret = construct_tdmrs(tdmr_array, &tdmr_num);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_free_tdmrs;
> +
> /*
> * Return -EINVAL until all steps of TDX module initialization
> * process are done.
> */
> ret = -EINVAL;
> +out_free_tdmrs:
> + /*
> + * The array of TDMRs is freed no matter the initialization is
> + * successful or not. They are not needed anymore after the
> + * module initialization.
> + */
> + free_pages_exact(tdmr_array, tdmr_array_sz);
> +out_free_tdx_mem:
> + if (ret)
> + free_tdx_memory();
> out:
> /*
> * Memory hotplug checks the hot-added memory region against the
> diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.h b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.h
> index 8e273756098c..a737f2b51474 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.h
> @@ -80,6 +80,29 @@ struct tdsysinfo_struct {
> };
> } __packed __aligned(TDSYSINFO_STRUCT_ALIGNMENT);
>
> +struct tdmr_reserved_area {
> + u64 offset;
> + u64 size;
> +} __packed;
> +
> +#define TDMR_INFO_ALIGNMENT 512
> +
> +struct tdmr_info {
> + u64 base;
> + u64 size;
> + u64 pamt_1g_base;
> + u64 pamt_1g_size;
> + u64 pamt_2m_base;
> + u64 pamt_2m_size;
> + u64 pamt_4k_base;
> + u64 pamt_4k_size;
> + /*
> + * Actual number of reserved areas depends on
> + * 'struct tdsysinfo_struct'::max_reserved_per_tdmr.
> + */
> + struct tdmr_reserved_area reserved_areas[0];
> +} __packed __aligned(TDMR_INFO_ALIGNMENT);
> +
> /*
> * Do not put any hardware-defined TDX structure representations below
> * this comment!

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-11-23 23:18    [W:0.053 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site