lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH hid v12 03/15] HID: initial BPF implementation
From
Hi Benjamin,

On 23/11/2022 14:48, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:

...

>> We have a kernel test that checks for new warning and error messages on
>> boot and with this change I am now seeing the following error message on
>> our Tegra platforms ...
>>
>> WARNING KERN hid_bpf: error while preloading HID BPF dispatcher: -13
>>
>> I have a quick look at the code, but I can't say I am familiar with
>> this. So I wanted to ask if a way to fix this or avoid this? I see the
>> code returns 0, so one option would be to make this an informational or
>> debug print.
>
> I am not in favor of debug in that case, because I suspect it'll hide
> too much when getting a bug report. Informational could do, yes.
>
> However, before that, I'd like to dig a little bit more on why it is
> failing. I thought arm64 now has support of tracing bpf programs, so I
> would not expect this to fail.

Yes it would be great if we could figure out why this is failing.

> Would you mind sending me your .config so I can check in it if you are
> missing anything? I am thinking that maybe I need to also depend on
> BPF_JIT.

It is basically the stock upstream arm64 defconfig, but I will forward
offline.

Cheers
Jon

--
nvpublic

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-11-23 19:49    [W:0.436 / U:1.848 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site