lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 06/20] x86/virt/tdx: Shut down TDX module in case of error
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 11/23/22 08:20, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> >>> Why is it done that way?
> >>>
> >>> Can it be changed to delay TDX initialization until the first TDX guest
> >>> needs to run?
> >>>
> >> Sean suggested.
> >>
> >> Hi Sean, could you commenet?
> > Waiting until the first TDX guest is created would result in false advertising,
> > as KVM wouldn't know whether or not TDX is actually supported until that first
> > VM is created. If we can guarantee that TDH.SYS.INIT will fail if and only if
> > there is a kernel bug, then I would be ok deferring the "enabling" until the
> > first VM is created.
>
> There's no way we can guarantee _that_. For one, the PAMT* allocations
> can always fail. I guess we could ask sysadmins to fire up a guest to
> "prime" things, but that seems a little silly. Maybe that would work as
> the initial implementation that we merge, but I suspect our users will
> demand more determinism, maybe a boot or module parameter.

Oh, you mean all of TDX initialization? I thought "initialization" here mean just
doing tdx_enable().

Yeah, that's not going to be a viable option. Aside from lacking determinisim,
it would be all too easy to end up on a system with fragmented memory that can't
allocate the PAMTs post-boot.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-11-23 18:38    [W:0.321 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site