Messages in this thread | | | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: [patch 06/15] timers: Update kernel-doc for various functions | Date | Tue, 22 Nov 2022 17:42:49 +0100 |
| |
On Tue, Nov 22 2022 at 10:41, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 16:18:37 +0100 > Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote: > >> >> + * This function cannot guarantee that the timer cannot be rearmed right >> >> + * after dropping the base lock. That needs to be prevented by the calling >> >> + * code if necessary. >> > > > Also, re-reading it again, I wounder if we can avoid the double use of > "cannot", in "cannot guarantee that the timer cannot". > > What about: > > This function does not prevent the timer from being rearmed right after > dropping the base lock.
Funny enough I noticed myself when I copied this sentence into the code and did exactly the same change :)
| |