Messages in this thread | | | From | John Ogness <> | Subject | Re: next-20221122: tinyconfig: ppc n s390: kernel/printk/printk.c:95:1: error: type specifier missing, defaults to 'int'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit int [-Werror,-Wimplicit-int] | Date | Tue, 22 Nov 2022 16:33:39 +0106 |
| |
On 2022-11-22, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> wrote: >> @paulmck: Do you have a problem with permanently activating CONFIG_SRCU? > > The people wanting it separate back in the day were those wanting very > tiny kernels. I have not heard from them in a long time, so maybe it > is now OK to just make SRCU unconditional.
Who decides this? Or maybe I should create a semaphore-based Variant of console_srcu_read_lock()/console_srcu_read_unlock() for the "!CONFIG_PRINTK && !CONFIG_SRCU" case?
John
| |