Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 22 Nov 2022 15:17:19 +0100 | Subject | Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] igbvf: Regard vf reset nack as success | From | Paul Menzel <> |
| |
Dear Akihiko,
Thank you for your patch.
Am 22.11.22 um 10:27 schrieb Akihiko Odaki: > vf reset nack actually represents the reset operation itself is > performed but no address is not assigned. Therefore, e1000_reset_hw_vf
Is … no … not assigned … intentional?
> should fill the "perm_addr" with the zero address and return success on > such an occassion. This prevents its callers in netdev.c from saying PF
occasion
> still resetting, and instead allows them to correctly report that no > address is assigned.
In what environment do you hit the problem?
[…]
Kind regards,
Paul
| |