lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] sched: Move numa_balancing sysctls to its own file
    On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 05:06:03PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
    > On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 03:25:31PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
    > > The sysctl_numa_balancing_promote_rate_limit and sysctl_numa_balancing
    > > are part of sched, move them to its own file.
    > >
    > > Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
    >
    > There is quite a bit of random cleanup on each kernel release
    > for sysctls to do things like what you just did. Because of this it has its
    > own tree to help avoid conflicts. Can you base your patches on the
    > sysctl-testing branch here and re-submit:
    >
    > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mcgrof/linux.git/log/?h=sysctl-testing
    >
    > If testing goes fine, then I'd move this to sysctl-next which linux-next
    > picks up for yet more testing.
    >
    > Are scheduling folks OK with this patch and me picking it up on the
    > sysctl-next tree if all tests are a go?

    Yeah, think so, it just moves stuff around a bit.

    ACK.

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2022-11-21 12:43    [W:2.701 / U:0.132 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site