lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] ext4: WANR_ON when detect abnormal 'i_reserved_data_blocks'
On Thu 17-11-22 09:42:45, Ye Bin wrote:
> From: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
>
> If 'i_reserved_data_blocks' is not cleared which mean something wrong
> with code, so emit WARN_ON to capture this abnormal closer to the first
> scene.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/super.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 63ef74eb8091..30885a6fe18b 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -1385,11 +1385,14 @@ static void ext4_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
> dump_stack();
> }
>
> - if (EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_data_blocks)
> - ext4_msg(inode->i_sb, KERN_ERR,
> - "Inode %lu (%p): i_reserved_data_blocks (%u) not cleared!",
> - inode->i_ino, EXT4_I(inode),
> - EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_data_blocks);
> + if (EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_data_blocks) {
> + ext4_warning(inode->i_sb, "Inode %lu (%p): "
> + "i_reserved_data_blocks (%u) not cleared!",
> + inode->i_ino, EXT4_I(inode),
> + EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_data_blocks);
> +
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + }

Hum, so I'd think that if this happens, the free space accounting is likely
wrong so we might as well just force the filesystem to error mode with
ext4_error() to force fsck? I also gives a good chance to various test
systems to detect there is some problem so we don't need the WARN_ON then?
What do others think?

Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-11-21 10:48    [W:0.567 / U:0.500 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site