Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 21 Nov 2022 17:23:57 -0800 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 rcu 13/16] workqueue: Make queue_rcu_work() use call_rcu_flush() |
| |
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:09:29PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 05:04:18PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > And another call_rcu() instance that cannot be lazy is the one > > in queue_rcu_work(), given that callers to queue_rcu_work() are > > not necessarily OK with long delays. > > So, this is fine but another thing we can do is propagating the distinction > through the workqueue interface so that the the choice can be made by > workqueue users. Would that make sense?
It might well! My thought was to wait to suggest that until we found a real-life case where this was needed, but I have no objection to being proactive here.
But the hard part... Thought for a good name? ;-)
Thanx, Paul
| |