lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [patch 06/15] timers: Update kernel-doc for various functions
From


On 11/21/22 12:43, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 21:28:43 +0100 (CET)
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
>> The kernel-doc of timer related functions is partially uncomprehensible
>> word salad. Rewrite it to make it useful.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> ---
>> kernel/time/timer.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>> 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>>
>> --- a/kernel/time/timer.c
>> +++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
>> @@ -1121,14 +1121,16 @@ static inline int
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> - * mod_timer_pending - modify a pending timer's timeout
>> - * @timer: the pending timer to be modified
>> - * @expires: new timeout in jiffies
>> + * mod_timer_pending - Modify a pending timer's timeout
>> + * @timer: The pending timer to be modified
>> + * @expires: New timeout in jiffies
>> *
>> - * mod_timer_pending() is the same for pending timers as mod_timer(),
>> - * but will not re-activate and modify already deleted timers.
>> + * mod_timer_pending() is the same for pending timers as mod_timer(), but
>> + * will not activate inactive timers.
>> *
>> - * It is useful for unserialized use of timers.
>> + * Return:
>> + * * %0 - The timer was inactive and not modified
>> + * * %1 - The timer was active and requeued to expire at @expires
>
> I didn't know of the '%' option in kernel-doc.
>
> Looking it up, I see it's for constants. Although it's missing in the
> examples for return values:
>
> Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst:
>
> ```
> Return values
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> The return value, if any, should be described in a dedicated section
> named ``Return``.
>
> .. note::
>
> #) The multi-line descriptive text you provide does *not* recognize
> line breaks, so if you try to format some text nicely, as in::
>
> * Return:
> * 0 - OK
> * -EINVAL - invalid argument
> * -ENOMEM - out of memory
>
> this will all run together and produce::
>
> Return: 0 - OK -EINVAL - invalid argument -ENOMEM - out of memory
>
> So, in order to produce the desired line breaks, you need to use a
> ReST list, e. g.::
>
> * Return:
> * * 0 - OK to runtime suspend the device
> * * -EBUSY - Device should not be runtime suspended
> ```
>
> Should this be updated?

Sure. Do you want to do it?

--
~Randy

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-11-22 01:12    [W:0.195 / U:0.332 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site